Scoping review reveals editing practices and standards in translation, suggesting training programs enhance skills.
This scoping review article explores the current landscape of editing practices and standards in translation, synthesising recent research to provide a comprehensive understanding of their methodologies, challenges, and impact. The study is guided by two research objectives: (1) examine the current editing and revision practices in translation, and (2) to explore how professional organisations and structured training programmes enhance editing and revision competencies among translators. Two research questions underpin the review: (1) What are the key editing and revision practices employed in translation? (2) How do professional organisations and training programmes influence the development of editing and revision skills to meet industry demands? Findings reveal a growing emphasis on systematic workflows, the integration of structured revision processes, and the influence of training programmes in fostering translator competencies. However, challenges persist, particularly in non-professional contexts and among those without formal training. In conclusion, enhancing quality in translation relies on robust editing and revision practices, supported by professional development and collaboration. This review underscores the need for ongoing research and the refinement of standards to maintain excellence in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: