This research evaluates polymer doses' impacts on Mombaça grass growth under irrigation, revealing significant morphological responses.
Biodegradable hydroretentive polymers, such as UPDT®, have emerged as promising alternatives to synthetic hydrogels, particularly in pasture systems where sustainable water management is crucial. These materials enhance subsurface drip irrigation by maintaining soil moisture, which supports germination and early root development until roots access deeper water reserves. However, their degradation dynamics in tropical forage systems remain poorly characterized, posing a challenge to long-term application strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different UPDT® doses (0, 7.5, 15, 22.5, and 30 kg ha−1) on the morphological and agronomic traits of Mombaça grass under controlled conditions. After a uniformity cycle, treatments were evaluated across four cultivation cycles with monitored irrigation to avoid water deficits. Morphogenetic traits such as number of live leaves (NLL), final number of emerging leaves (NEmL), leaf appearance rate (LAR), and stem elongation rate (SER), as well as shoot dry mass (SDM), were analyzed. Results showed that morphological variables responded quadratically to polymer doses during the initial and intermediate cycles. In the final cycle, reductions in these traits and in water productivity suggested the onset of polymer degradation and loss of hydroretentive capacity. Agronomic traits were influenced throughout all cycles, with the fourth cycle showing the highest SDM due to elevated temperatures. These findings highlight the need to better understand the degradation kinetics of biodegradable hydrogels such as UPDT® in tropical pastures. Field trials are recommended to define optimal reapplication intervals and integrate degradation monitoring into irrigation planning, ensuring long-term sustainability in pasture management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miranda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: