Novel approach improves alignment and adjustment of lidar data, indicating significant accuracy gains.
The present paper introduces a novel methodology for LiDAR point transformation and adjustment, grounded in two primary concepts. In the initial phase of the process, LiDAR data are mapped onto synthetic images, known as lidargrams, through the utilization of exterior orientation parameters (EOPs) of a virtual camera. Secondly, unique lidargram point identifiers (ULPIs) are assigned to each LiDAR point, ensuring the preservation of the relationship between specific LiDAR points and their corresponding lidargram projections. This process facilitates the reconstruction of ground points from their respective projections. The integration of these concepts facilitates the alignment and adjustment of blocks of lidargrams, thereby enabling the estimation of novel EOPs. The exchange of arbitrary EOPs and the intersection of the transformed point cloud based on the ULPIs are facilitated by these refined EOPs. The LiDAR data undergo a three-dimensional transformation using photogrammetric algorithms. This is in accordance with the fundamental principles of lidargrammetry. The accuracy of the new approach and its implementation in a research tool were verified on a range of data types, encompassing synthetic, semisynthetic, and real data. By evaluating the approach across a wide range of data sources, the authors were able to assess its effectiveness and reliability in different scenarios. The method’s flexibility is evidenced by its ability to reduce the final 3D root mean square error of discrepancies measured at check points by 30 times in synthetic data tests, 12 times in semisynthetic data tests, and 96 times in real data tests. The quantitative results obtained provide substantial support for the validity of the presented methodology. The efficacy of the proposed method was also evaluated by way of a comparative analysis with a selection of widely utilized LiDAR processing software developed by TerraSolid Ltd.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rzonca et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: