Numerical analysis reveals how horizontal loading alters negative skin friction in monopiles, suggesting critical considerations for offshore wind foundations.
Large-diameter rock-socketed monopiles supporting offshore wind turbines in soft clay strata face significant geotechnical risks from negative skin friction (NFS) induced by construction surcharges. While the effects of NFS on axial drag loads are documented, the critical interaction between horizontal pile loading and NFS development remains poorly understood. This research bridges this gap using a rigorously validated 3D finite element model that simulates the complex coupling of vertical substructure loads (5 MN), horizontal loading, and surcharge-induced consolidation. The model’s accuracy was confirmed through comprehensive verification against field data for both NFS evolution under surcharge and horizontal load–displacement behavior. The initial analysis under representative conditions (10 MN horizontal load, 100 kPa surcharge, 3600 days consolidation) revealed that horizontal loading fundamentally distorts NFS distribution in the upper pile segment (0 to −24 m), transforming smooth profiles into distinct dual-peak morphologies while increasing the maximum NFS magnitude by 57% (from −45.4 kPa to −71.5 kPa) and relocating its position 21 m upward. This redistribution was mechanistically linked to horizontal soil displacement patterns. Crucially, the NFS neutral plane remained invariant at the clay–rock interface (−39 m), demonstrating complete independence from horizontal loading effects. A systematic parametric study evaluated key operational factors: (1) consolidation time progressively increased NFS magnitude throughout the clay layer, evolving from near-linear to dual-peaked distributions in the upper clay (0 to −18 m); NFS stabilized in the upper clay after 720 days while continuing to increase in the lower clay (−18 to −39 m) due to downward surcharge transfer, accompanied by neutral plane deepening (from −36.5 m to −39.5 m) and 84% maximum axial force escalation (12.5 MN to 23 MN); (2) horizontal load magnitude amplified upper clay NFS peaks at −3.2 m and −9.3 m, with the shallow peak magnitude increasing linearly with load intensity, though it neither altered lower clay NFS nor neutral plane position; (3) surcharge magnitude increased overall NFS, but upper clay NFS (0 to −18 m) stabilized beyond 100 kPa, while lower clay NFS continued rising with higher surcharges, and the neutral plane descended progressively (from −38 m to −39.5 m). These findings demonstrate that horizontal loading critically exacerbates peak NFS values and redistributes friction in upper pile segments without influencing the neutral plane, whereas surcharge magnitude and consolidation time govern neutral plane depth, total NFS magnitude, and maximum drag load. This research delivers essential theoretical insights and practical guidelines for predicting NFS-induced drag loads and ensuring the long-term safety of offshore wind foundations in soft clays under complex multi-directional loading scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: