Study employs difference-in-differences design to assess policy impacts on A-share listed companies, indicating capital flow increases to renewable-energy projects.
Abstract Drawing on the interdisciplinary lens of humanities and social sciences communications, this study investigates how China’s green-finance policy regime reshapes the funding landscape for renewable-energy projects undertaken by A-share listed companies. Employing a difference-in-differences design on firm-level panel data (2012–2024), we estimate policy impacts across project-scale strata. Results show that green-finance policies significantly increase capital flows to renewable-energy projects at all scales, with the strongest effects observed for large-scale installations. Mechanism tests reveal three social-financial channels: (1) risk-perception reduction, (2) alleviation of financing constraints, (3) optimisation of capital structure that enables project-scale expansion. By linking financial regulation to corporate investment behaviour and societal energy transitions, the findings advance Humanities & Social Sciences Communications’ mission to illuminate the policy–finance–society nexus and to inform evidence-based pathways toward sustainable development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: