Observational analysis revealed that residue management affects C-CO2 retention and GHG emissions in eucalyptus, suggesting strategies for climate mitigation.
Introduction The greenhouse gas balance is a central theme in discussions related to forest ecosystems. In this context, the present study evaluated the impact of five eucalyptus harvest residue management systems on atmospheric C-CO 2 retention in soil, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the global warming potential (GWP) in Eucalyptus saligna plantations. Methods The management systems examined were: AR - all harvest residues retained on soil; NB - harvest residues kept on soil, except bark; NBr - harvest residues kept on soil, except branches; NR - all harvest residues (bark, branches, leaves) removed; NRs - all residues from the previous rotation and new plantation litter removed using shade cloth. Soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and methane (CH 4 ) were monitored over 12 months (October 2016 to October 2017). Soil samples were collected to a depth of one meter to assess atmospheric C-CO 2 retention. Results and discussion Annual N 2 O emissions were low (0.11–0.23 kg N-N 2 O ha −1 year −1 ) and showed no clear relationship with the amount of nitrogen added through residues. The soil consistently functioned as a methane sink across all management systems, with CH 4 fluxes ranging from –2.56 to –3.91 kg C-CH 4 ha −1 year −1 . The highest rate of C-CO 2 retention in soil (–5,540 kg C-CO 2 ha −1 year −1 ) was observed under the AR management system, while the lowest (–1,752 kg C-CO 2 ha −1 year −1 ) occurred under the NRs system. AR management also resulted in the lowest global warming potential (–33,946 kg C-CO 2 ha −1 year −1 ), primarily due to soil C-CO 2 retention (15.43%) and carbon accumulation in biomass and wood products (84.57%). These findings demonstrate that retaining eucalyptus harvest residues in subtropical sandy soils, in conjunction with carbon sequestration in wood products, constitutes an effective forest management strategy for mitigating global warming.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: