Meta-analysis reveals benefits of paclitaxel over fluorouracil in overall survival for esophageal cancer.
Introduction Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is now the first-line standard for metastatic/recurrent esophageal cancer, with rapid immunotherapy advancements significantly improving patient outcomes. International guidelines recommend platinum-based combinations with either 5-fluorouracil or paclitaxel as first-line treatments. Currently, no head-to-head studies directly compare fluorouracil and paclitaxel regimens in esophageal cancer. Methods We systematically searched online literature for clinical trials investigating first-line immunotherapy-chemotherapy combinations for esophageal cancer. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software, with pooled results expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Both paclitaxel- and fluorouracil-based immunotherapy combinations demonstrated clinical benefits in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rates. Notably, paclitaxel-based immunotherapy significantly increased ORR compared to fluorouracil-based regimens (OR 2.61 vs 1.58). Discussion Our findings suggest that paclitaxel-immunotherapy combinations may offer enhanced disease control compared to fluorouracil-based approaches, warranting further studies to identify optimal patient populations and refine treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: