Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive cross-sectional study reveals causes of neonatal jaundice in neonates, indicating significant associations.
Background: Neonatal jaundice is a frequent cause of hospital admissions in newborns and can result from a range of physiological and pathological conditions. Early identification of its underlying etiology is essential to guide appropriate management and prevent complications, especially in resource-limited settings where diagnostic tools may be limited. Objective: To determine the frequency of the causes of neonatal jaundice in the neonatal intensive care unit in tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from January to May 2025 at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, CMH Abbottabad. Methodology: A total of 164 neonates under 28 days of age with clinical and biochemical evidence of jaundice were included using non-probability consecutive sampling. Neonates with prior phototherapy, congenital anomalies, or life-threatening illness were excluded. Data were collected on demographic characteristics and laboratory evaluations to establish the etiology of jaundice. Results: The most common cause of neonatal jaundice was physiological jaundice (47.6%), followed by ABO incompatibility (25.6%) and Rh incompatibility (11.6%). Statistically significant associations were observed between Rh incompatibility and male gender (p=0.043), ABO incompatibility and rural residence (p=0.007), and physiological jaundice with family history (p=0.021) and urban residence (p<0.001). ABO incompatibility also showed a significant correlation with low birth weight (p=0.049). Conclusion: Physiological jaundice remains the most prevalent cause of neonatal jaundice, while Rh and ABO incompatibilities also contribute significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: