Descriptive case-control study identifies significant risk factors like fetal distress and postdate in women, linking them to meconium complications.
Background and objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid among women who delivered vaginally and were admitted to the delivery room at Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil city." Methods: A descriptive case-control study was conducted in the labor ward of Maternity Teaching Hospital in the Kurdistan region, Iraq. The study setting was the delivery room. A non-probability purposive sample included 342 mothers with singleton pregnancies: 171 cases with Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid and 171 controls with clear amniotic fluid. The data were analyzed using Version 23 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: The majority of women (82.7%) were illiterate, and more than half (58.2%) were multiparous. 57% of the newborns were male. Approximately 18.7% of cases had caesarean sections compared to 5.3% in the control group, which is statistically highly significant (P-value < 0.001). Additionally, about 30% of cases involving neonates were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, compared to just 1.8% in the control group, which is also statistically highly significant (P-value < 0.001). Postdate (B Coefficient: 2.487, 95% Confidence Interval: 4.686 to 30.854) and fetal distress (B Coefficient: 3.048, 95% Confidence Interval: 5.662 to 78.393) were highly significantly associated with Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid. Conclusion: There is a highly significant association between risk factors such as postdate and fetal distress in the case-control groups. The following factors did not significantly correlate with the case-control groups: preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes, polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, prolonged labor, induction of labor, or spontaneous labor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: