Analysis shows significant interactions between palladium and 2H-MoS2, suggesting implications for electronic properties.
Palladium (Pd) adlayers on 2H-MoS2(0001) were found, by low energy electron diffraction, to adopt the 3.16 Å lattice constant of the 2H-MoS2(0001) substrate, which has the Pd–Pd spacing vastly expanded from the natural in-plane spacing of 2.75 Å. This vastly expanded Pd–Pd in-plane spacing persists to a Pd overlayer thickness of at least 20 Å without any evidence of surface reconstruction or faceting. In addition, the occupied and unoccupied electronic band structures of the Pd overlayer on the 2H-MoS2(0001) substrate have been characterized by both angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) inverse photoemission spectroscopy (IPES) and density functional theory (DFT) based calculations. The results indicate that the Pd adlayer interacts strongly with the 2H-MoS2(0001) substrate. In fact, this interaction of Pd with the MoS2(0001) substrate is sufficiently strong to negate any meaningful application of a simple Schottky barrier interface scheme. This fact is evident from the combination of both the photoemission and inverse photoemission, which indicate there is an increase of 2H-MoS2(0001) substrate band gap with increasing Pd overlayer thickness, at the Γ̅ point (the center of the Brillouin zone). As a result of such strong interactions between the Pd adlayer and MoS2(0001) substrate, a considerable amount of Pd must be added (at least 2 monolayers) before the emergence of the Pd 4d band structure. The emergence of Pd adlayer band structure is most readily apparent at the Γ̅ point and is consistent with DFT calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: