This research demonstrates that a structured curriculum increases teaching competencies in pre-service teachers, suggesting a holistic approach to pedagogy design.
Objective: This study addresses the fragmentation and compartmentalization in the pedagogical training of pre-service teachers, particularly primary education majors, in the context of contemporary educational reform. By adopting a structured framework to holistically redesign pedagogy course clusters, the research systematically enhances teaching competencies among teacher candidates, offering actionable references for educators in normal universities. Methods: The instructing faculty constructs a "four-pronged pedagogical framework" to address prevalent issues in curriculum design, including ambiguous teaching objectives, fragmented content delivery, conventional instructional methods, and overly simplistic assessment practices. This systematic approach encompasses: Objective-driven instruction to clarify student misconceptions, Integrated curricular content for systematic knowledge delivery, Value-embedded pedagogy through diversified teaching modalities, Comprehensive evaluation mechanisms to monitor pedagogical effectiveness. Results: Empirical findings from a five-year teaching practice demonstrate that systematically delivering pedagogy courses through a structured framework significantly enhances pre-service teachers' instructional competencies, deepens their subject matter knowledge and pedagogical understanding, and facilitates the effective application of these skills in authentic classroom contexts. Conclusion: The structured framework-driven approach utilizing pedagogy course clusters has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing pre-service teachers' instructional competencies, though its implementation pathways require sustained collaborative exploration and iterative refinement by normal universities and faculty members.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao-hong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: