Background: Pain is a common issue in hospitals and can affect patients’ health and satisfaction. Various previous studies show that almost 50% of admitted patients report pain, with moderate-to-severe pain in up to 20% of the patients. A hospital-wide pain management policy is crucial to the early identification and optimal management of admitted patients in pain. Aims: The aim of the study was to strengthen the existing hospital pain management program. Settings and Designs: This quality improvement study (clinical audit) was conducted in a 250-bed tertiary care hospital in India over a period of 8 months. Materials and Methods: A preintervention audit was done to assess compliance to correct pain monitoring standards and delivery of initial analgesic within 30 min of pain escalation for Numeric Rating Score >7 (turnaround time [TAT] <30 min). A survey to assess nursing knowledge about pain management was also conducted. Over the next 3 months, multiple corrective interventions were implemented. This was followed by a postintervention audit of the same parameters. Statistical Analysis Used: A Fishbone analysis was done to determine the various factors contributing to poor compliance with standards. Accordingly, a driver diagram was designed to improve the pain program at our hospital. Results and Conclusion: Successful interventions were implemented, which led to significant improvement in correct pain monitoring standards (52.8% to 98.6%), timely escalation of pain score >7 to the pain management team (PMT), and timely delivery of initial analgesic within 30 min (63.8% to 89.9%). This was directly related to the improvement in nursing knowledge and training (62.7%–85.5%). This shows that creating a “pain-free” hospital requires the implementation of well-thought-out pain management policies and procedures and comprehensive training of nursing staff.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tewari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: