This analysis demonstrates connections between pythagoras numbers and optimality conditions in ternary forms.
We study the Pythagoras numbers py ( 3 , 2 d ) py(3,2d) of real ternary forms, defined for each degree 2 d 2d as the minimal number r r such that every degree 2 d 2d ternary form which is a sum of squares can be written as the sum of at most r r squares of degree d d forms. Scheiderer [Math. Z. 286 (2017), pp. 559–570] showed that d + 1 ≤ py ( 3 , 2 d ) ≤ d + 2 d+1≤ py(3,2d)≤ d+2 . We show that p y ( 3 , 2 d ) = d + 1 py(3,2d) = d+1 for 2 d = 8 , 10 , 12 2d = 8,10,12 . Our approach is to connect the problem with optimality conditions for a Euclidean distance problem. When paired with Diesel’s characterization of height 3 Gorenstein algebras, this allows us to control the syzygies of the forms involved in the decomposition into sums of squares.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blekherman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: