This chapter reviews limitations of behavioral data in emotional research, suggesting integrating physiological methods may improve insights into animal emotions.
Emotion research has gained enormous momentum through the emerging field of comparativeaffective science, which seeks to uncover important aspects about the emotional life ofnonhuman animals. This chapter reviews the limitations of relying solely on behaviouralinformation to derive information on affective states in animals. Instead, it emphasizes thevalue of combining behavioural coding methods with novel non-invasive physiologicalmethods. We specifically explore advances in automated behavioural tracking, facial actioncoding, infrared thermography (IRT), infrared videography (IR) and microwave radartechnologies. These promising new tools offer insights into internal states without restrainingor potentially harming animals, thus providing more ethical empirical assessment. We arguethat multi-dimensional approaches that combine behavioural and physiological data enablericher and more accurate interpretations of animal emotions. As future avenue, we propose“behaviour-physiology profiles” to uncover biological and evolutionary foundations ofaffective processes across species. We believe such an integrated framework holds greatpromise for advancing animal welfare, communication science and our understanding of thecomplex emotional life of animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heesen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: