This analysis reveals robust suture classification efficacy using small datasets, suggesting transfer learning enhances surgical assessments.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of transfer learning with pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated binary classification of surgical suture quality (high-quality/low-quality) using photographs of three suture types: interrupted open vascular sutures (IOVS), continuous over-and-over open sutures (COOS), and interrupted laparoscopic sutures (ILS). To address the challenge of limited medical data, eight state-of-the-art CNN architectures—EfficientNetB0, ResNet50V2, MobileNetV3Large, VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, Xception, and DenseNet121—were trained and validated on small datasets (100–190 images per type) using 5-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using the F1-score, AUC-ROC, and a custom weighted stability-aware score (Scoreadj). The results demonstrate that transfer learning achieves robust classification (F1 > 0.90 for IOVS/ILS, 0.79 for COOS) despite data scarcity. ResNet50V2, DenseNet121, and Xception were more stable by Scoreadj, with ResNet50V2 achieving the highest AUC-ROC (0.959 ± 0.008) for IOVS internal view classification. GradCAM visualizations confirmed model focus on clinically relevant features (e.g., stitch uniformity, tissue apposition). These findings validate transfer learning as a powerful approach for developing objective, automated surgical skill assessment tools, reducing reliance on subjective expert evaluations while maintaining accuracy in resource-constrained settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishchenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: