Retrospective study evaluates femur first technique's impact on combined sagittal index in THA, suggesting spinopelvic characteristics influence outcomes.
Background: Emerging parameters, such as the spino-pelvic unit and the combined sagittal index (CSI), are gaining importance in evaluating and optimizing implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our institution adopts the “femur first” technique to achieve the desired combined anteversion (CA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of the ‘femur first’ technique and spinopelvic characteristics in achieving the CSIstanding ‘safe zone’ in primary THA. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing primary THA were included in the present retrospective study. All patients underwent radiographic assessments in the standing position with the EOS 2D/3D radiography system. Results: Forty patients (40 hips) were enrolled. Of these, 34 patients fell inside the CSIstanding “safe zone” (205–245°). When considering the restricted CSIstanding “safe zone” for patients at high risk for adverse spinopelvic characteristics (215–245°), only 16 patients fell inside the range. We demonstrated a positive linear correlation between CSIstanding and CA (p < 0.0001). Pelvic tilt (PT) showed a positive correlation both in standing and relaxed sitting positions, (p < 0.001). Sacral slope (SS) showed a significant positive correlation in the relaxed sitting (p = 0.003) position but not in the standing position (p = 0.34). The correlation analysis between CSIrelaxed-sitting and ΔSS showed a positive correlation (p = 0.003). Conclusions: The “femur first” technique is able to achieve the CSI “safe zone” in most patients; however, it seems insufficient in those with adverse spinopelvic characteristics, who are at higher risk of dislocation. Moreover, the CA, the position of the pelvis in space (PT), and its mobility (ΔSS) greatly influence the CSI “safe zone” in patients undergoing primary THA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guazzoni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: