Analysis reveals hardness measures relate to tensile strength in Ti6Al4V alloy, suggesting improvements in predictive methods.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of estimating the tensile strength of Ti6Al4V alloy, based on HV measurements. The investigation included samples that were manufactured using both additive technology and conventional methods, under various conditions: as-built, heat-treated, and untested mechanically. Static tensile tests and HV measurements were performed to assess the influence of the manufacturing method, heat treatment, and mechanical loading on material performance. The highest tensile strength was recorded for as-built samples, while the greatest ductility was observed in conventionally drawn bar samples. Hardness values generally correlated with tensile strength trends; however, in heat-treated specimens, the relationship between hardness and tensile strength was found to be nonlinear. Specimens that were not subjected to tensile testing exhibited higher HV values than their mechanically tested counterparts, indicating a potential effect of prior deformation on the local material condition. The results confirm that hardness testing can be a useful indirect method for estimating the tensile strength of Ti6Al4V, particularly in materials with controlled and uniform microstructures. For additively manufactured and heat-treated materials, however, the current empirical models may require adjustment or enhancement using advanced predictive approaches. The proposed indirect method offers an alternative to destructive testing, especially in the industrial quality control context for metal AM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karolewska et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: