Is Deep Remission the Right Time to De-Escalate Biologic Therapy in IBD? A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background and Aim: Long-term treatment with biologic therapy alongside immunomAfodulators in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be associated with severe side effects. The objective of this study was to determine whether discontinuing anti-TNF treatment after two years in patients who have achieved mucosal healing is associated with lower relapse rates. Materials and Methods: A total of 67 patients with IBD from a single tertiary IBD Center who had achieved mucosal healing were enrolled in this retrospective study. In this single-center retrospective study (January 2014–December 2022), we screened 67 IBD patients in deep remission (endoscopic mucosal healing after ≥2 years of anti-TNF therapy). After excluding three patients without histologic data, 64 patients (25 ulcerative colitis, 39 Crohn’s disease) were analyzed. Mayo endoscopic sub-score and SES-CD were used to evaluate endoscopic activity after two years of anti-TNF therapy. Histological activity was assessed using the GHAS (for CD) and Nancy index (for UC). Results: A total of 67 patients were screened, of whom 3 were excluded due to a lack of biopsies. Of the 64 included patients, 39.06% (25/64) had UC and 60.9% (39/64) had CD, with a mean disease duration of 11.6 ± 8.0 years. All patients were in endoscopic remission at the time of therapy de-escalation, and 60.9% (39/64) also achieved histological remission (“deep remission”). In the follow-up of 38.6 months (IQR 30–48) after biologic therapy was stopped, 57.8% (37/64) relapsed with a median time to relapse of 13.5 months (IQR 8–24) off anti-TNF—a total of 34 patients required a restarting of biologic therapy. Using Spearman’s correlation, a moderate connection was observed between histological activity at withdrawal and subsequent relapse (rho = 0.467, p < 0.001). The probability of relapsing within 4 years after anti-TNF cessation was significantly higher (OR 2.72) in patients with histologically active disease at the time of de-escalation. Conclusions: Achieving ‘deep remission’ (clinical, endoscopic, and histological healing) may be a suitable parameter for making decisions on when to de-escalate therapy; however, given that over half of patients in endoscopic remission relapse after discontinuation, any de-escalation should be approached with caution and individualized patient assessment.