Finite element analysis reveals improved stress distribution in extra-short implants, indicating better stability.
Background: In scenarios of limited bone height, extra-short implants offer a minimally invasive option. However, biomechanical behavior under functional loading remains critical for success. Objective: To evaluate stress distribution in cortical and cancellous bone, abutment, implant, and surrounding structures when two extra-short implants with straight abutments are subjected to axial load, using finite element analysis. Methods: 3D models of two extra-short implants (5×4 mm and 5×5 mm) with straight abutments were created using CATIA and analyzed using ANSYS Workbench. Axial forces of 150 N were applied. Von Mises stress values were recorded. Results: The 5×5 mm straight implant showed the lowest stress values in all components compared to the 5×4 mm implant. Stress was highest in cortical bone, followed by implant, abutment, crown, and cement. Conclusion: The larger-diameter short implant (5×5 mm) with a straight abutment demonstrated better stress distribution under axial loading, suggesting improved biomechanical stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazirkar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: