Randomized controlled trial evaluates app-delivered CBT-I versus sleep hygiene education in chronic pain patients, indicating accessible treatment potential.
More than half of individuals with chronic pain also experience insomnia. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an effective and safe first-line treatment; however, access remains a major barrier to widespread implementation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a 9-week app-delivered CBT-I intervention, compared to an app-delivered sleep hygiene education program (active control), in reducing insomnia and pain severity in patients with disabling chronic pain and comorbid insomnia. The trial is a 1:1 randomized, single-blind, superiority trial randomizing 160 patients with disabling chronic pain and comorbid insomnia to either app-delivered CBT-I for 9 weeks or app-delivered sleep hygiene education for 9 weeks. Primary outcomes are the between-group differences in change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and average pain intensity assessed using a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS) from baseline to post-interventions. Short-term secondary outcomes post-intervention include perceived effects on sleep and pain (Global Perceived Effect scales), sleep quality, thoughts and beliefs about sleep and pain, physical and mental health, and EQ5D-5L. Medium-term and long-term secondary outcomes (ISI, pain intensity, EQ5D-5L, health care costs, and use of sleep and pain medication) will be collected after 24 and 52 weeks. Exploratory physiological sleep metrics from at-home ear-electroencephalography (EEG) will be collected for five nights at baseline and for five nights during week 8. This planned study addresses a critical need for identifying effective, safe, and easily accessible alternatives to the current treatments for patients with chronic pain and insomnia. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06361914. Registered on April 17, 2024.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: