Reflective metasurface enables polarization conversion in x-band frequencies, indicating implications for communication systems.
A novel reflective metasurface (RMS) is proposed in this paper. The MS measures 128 × 128 × 2.794 mm3 and consists of a six-layer vertically stacked structure, with a liquid crystal (LC) cavity in the middle layer. A dual fan-shaped direct current (DC) bias circuit is designed to minimize the interaction between the radio frequency (RF) signal and the DC source, allowing control of the LC dielectric constant via bias voltage. This enables multi-band operation to improve communication capacity and quality for x-band devices. The polarization conversion (PC) structure employs an orthogonal anisotropic design, utilizing logarithmic functions to create two pairs of bowtie microstrip patches for linear-to-circular polarization conversion (LCPC). Simulation results show that for x-polarized incident waves, with an LC dielectric constant of εr = 2.8, left- and right-handed circularly polarized (LHCP and RHCP) waves are achieved in the frequency ranges of 8.15–8.46 GHz and 9.84–12.52 GHz, respectively. For εr = 3.9, LHCP and RHCP are achieved in 9–9.11 GHz and 9.86–11.81 GHz, respectively, and for εr = 4.6, they are in 8.96–9.11 GHz and 9.95–11.51 GHz. In the case of y-polarized incident waves, the MS reflects the reverse CP waves within the same frequency ranges. Measured results show that at εr = 2.8, the axial ratio (AR) is below 3 dB in the frequency ranges 8.16–8.46 GHz and 9.86–12.48 GHz, with 3 dB AR relative bandwidth (ARBW) of 3.61% and 23.46%, respectively. For εr = 4.6, the AR < 3 dB in the frequency range of 9.78–11.34 GHz, with a 3 dB ARBW of 14.77%. Finally, the measured and simulated results are compared to validate the proposed design, which can be applied to various applications within the corresponding operating frequency band.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: