Analysis demonstrates chloride resistance in fiber-reinforced concrete, indicating the importance of fiber type and volume.
Chloride ion penetration is one of the most aggressive threats to reinforced concrete, as it triggers the electrochemical corrosion of steel reinforcement, compromising structural integrity and durability. Chloride ingress occurs through the porous structure of concrete, making permeability control crucial for enhancing structural longevity. Fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) is widely used to improve durability; however, the effects of different fiber types on chloride resistance remain unclear. This study examines the influence of glass and polypropylene fibers on concrete’s microstructure and chloride penetration resistance. Cylindrical specimens were prepared, including a reference mix without fibers and mixes with 0.25% and 0.50% fiber content by volume. Both fiber types were tested for chloride resistance. The accelerated non-steady-state migration method was employed to determine the resistance coefficients to chloride ion penetration, while X-ray macrofluorescence (MacroXRF) mapped the chlorine infiltration depth in the samples. Compressive strength decreased in all fiber-reinforced samples, with 0.50% glass fiber leading to a 56% reduction in strength. Nevertheless, the XRF results showed that a 0.25% fiber content significantly reduced chloride penetration, with polypropylene fibers outperforming glass fibers. These findings highlight the critical role of fiber type and volume in improving concrete durability, offering insights for designing long-lasting FRC structures in chloride-rich environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: