Observational analysis shows CD4 and CD8 T cells influence AD risk, indicating ceramide's mediating role.
Neuroinflammation involving peripheral immune cells, particularly T lymphocytes, has been implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. Metabolic dysregulation in sphingolipid pathways may influence neuroinflammatory processes in AD pathogenesis. However, the specific roles of T cell subsets and their interactions with metabolic pathways in AD pathogenesis remain unclear. To determine the causal contributions of peripheral T cell subsets to AD risk and investigate whether blood metabolites mediate this association. We integrated single-cell RNA sequencing with flow cytometry to identify dynamic alterations in T cell subsets during AD progression. Adoptive transfer experiments in APP/PS1 mice validated the functional roles of specific T cell populations. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) evaluated causal relationships between T cell traits and AD risk, while two-step MR assessed the mediating role of blood metabolites. CD4 effector memory (EM) and CD8 central memory (CM) T cells expanded in AD patients, particularly during mild cognitive impairment. Adoptive transfer of either CD4 EM or CD8 CM T cells into APP/PS1 mice exacerbated cognitive deficits and amyloid-β pathology. MR revealed causal associations of CM CD8br % T cell (OR = 1.22, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.39, P = 0.002) and EM CD4+ % CD4+ (OR = 1.09, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.18, P = 0.027) with AD risk. Elevated plasma ceramide levels were also causally associated with increased AD risk (OR = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.10-1.64, P = 0.004), with CD4 EM influencing ceramide levels (OR = 1.03, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.06, P = 0.020). Ceramide mediated 11.20 % of the effect between CD4 EM and AD pathogenesis. This study identifies CD4 EM and CD8 CM T cells as key drivers of AD-related neuroinflammation and uncovers a possible immunometabolic pathway linking CD4 EM, ceramide metabolism, and AD risk, suggesting potential targets for early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: