Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An emergency protocol demonstrates 100% sensitivity in ruling out acute coronary syndrome, suggesting improved patient flow.
Emergency department (ED) visits have gradually increased throughout recent years, contributing to the widespread problem of ED overcrowding. The purpose of this study was to develop a rapid rule-out strategy for patients with acute chest pain that integrates clinical characteristics and Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) to improve ED patient care. H-FABP point-of-care test results of 130 patients were integrated into a modified HEART score, with a score ≤ 3 points indicating rule-out of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Diagnostic performance was assessed with comparative analyses between the Ex-ACS protocol, the conventional HEART score, and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-h algorithm. In this study cohort, eight patients (6.2%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI and none were misclassified as rule-out by the novel protocol. The Ex-ACS protocol ruled out ACS in 63 patients (48.4%) with a median time of 16 min, notably faster than the ESC 0/1-h algorithm (123 min). The Ex-ACS protocol demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 51.6%, surpassing the traditional HEART score which exhibited a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 46.3%. The Ex-ACS Protocol offers a promising strategy for rapid ACS exclusion, potentially improving patient flow in EDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demirel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: