PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Journal of the American Chemical Society22 citations

Quantifying Interface-Dependent Active Sites Induced by Topotactic Exsolution for CO2 Electrolysis

View Full Paper
YSYuxiang ShenSWShuo WangXCXiaoqin Chen

Key Points

  • CO2 electrolysis performance peaks at 1.73 A cm-2 with interfacial parameters influencing catalytic activity.
  • A linear positive correlation exists between CoFe/LSCC interface perimeter and its intrinsic catalytic performance.
  • The study employs x-ray absorption and mössbauer spectroscopy to analyze the role of Fe in Co cation exsolution.
  • Architectural tailoring of CoFe/LSCC interfaces through ion exchange enables control over exsolved nanoparticle coverage.

Abstract

Supported metal nanoparticles via in situ exsolution hold great promise for many fields including CO2 electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells. However, identifying and quantifying such in situ formed interfacial sites remain a challenge. Herein, we present a quantitative analysis of the inherent exsolution process and normalize the interfacial sites to the intrinsic activity of CO2 electrolysis. CoFe/La0.6Sr0.4Cr0.9Co0.1O3-δ (LSCC) interfaces are architecturally tailored by modulating the concentration of guest Fe cations, enabling precise control over the coverage of exsolved CoFe nanoparticles through a topotactic ion exchange strategy. The promotional role of Fe in facilitating Co cation exsolution is quantitatively investigated via X-ray absorption spectroscopy and Mössbauer spectroscopy. A quantitative correlation between the interfacial parameters of CoFe/LSCC and their intrinsic catalytic performance is well disclosed. CO2 electrolysis performance is linearly positively correlated with the perimeter of the CoFe/LSCC interface, reaching a peak performance of 1.73 A cm-2 at an optimal interfacial perimeter of 29.3 μm μm-2. This study offers valuable insights into quantitative research on metal/oxide catalysts for CO2 electrolysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ce5d54b1d3bfb60f5244https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c09067
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Operando Tracking the Interactions between CoOx and CeO2 during Oxygen Evolution Reaction2024 · 56 citations
  2. 2A High‐Entropy Layered Perovskite Coated with In Situ Exsolved Core‐Shell CuFe@FeO x Nanoparticles for Efficient CO 2 Electrolysis2023 · 79 citations
  3. 3Electrocatalysis in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers2024 · 135 citations
  4. 4Structural, electronic, and magnetic study on hematite nanorods: Effect of carbon coating and annealing temperature2023 · 8 citations
  5. 5Cation-swapped homogeneous nanoparticles in perovskite oxides for high power density2019 · 183 citations