This study demonstrates the efficacy of spectral CT thermometry for monitoring thermal ablation, highlighting improved precision and accuracy through various artifact reduction techniques.
Effective thermal ablation of liver tumors requires precise monitoring of the ablation zone. Computed tomography (CT) thermometry can non-invasively monitor lethal temperatures but suffers from metal artifacts caused by ablation equipment. This study assesses spectral CT thermometry's applicability during microwave ablation, comparing the reproducibility, precision, and accuracy of attenuation-based versus physical density-based thermometry. Furthermore, it identifies optimal metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods: O-MAR, deep learning-MAR, spectral CT, and combinations thereof. Four gel phantoms embedded with temperature sensors underwent a 10- minute, 60 W microwave ablation imaged by dual-layer spectral CT scanner in 23 scans over time. For each scan attenuation-based and physical density-based temperature maps were reconstructed. Attenuation-based and physical density-based thermometry models were tested for reproducibility over three repetitions; a fourth repetition focused on accuracy. MAR techniques were applied to one repetition to evaluate temperature precision in artifact-corrupted slices. The correlation between CT value and temperature was highly linear with an R-squared value exceeding 96 %. Model parameters for attenuation-based and physical density-based thermometry were -0.38 HU/°C and 0.00039 °C-1, with coefficients of variation of 2.3 % and 6.7 %, respectively. Physical density maps improved temperature precision in presence of needle artifacts by 73 % compared to attenuation images. O-MAR improved temperature precision with 49 % compared to no MAR. Attenuation-based thermometry yielded narrower Bland-Altman limits-of-agreement (-7.7 °C to 5.3 °C) than physical density-based thermometry. Spectral physical density-based CT thermometry at 150 keV, utilized alongside O-MAR, enhances temperature precision in presence of metal artifacts and achieves reproducible temperature measurements with high accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koetzier et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: