Analysis demonstrates 12.97% prevalence of RM.MhoVI in Mycoplasma hominis using qPCR, indicating unique enzymatic features.
Restriction-modification (RM) systems are widespread defense mechanisms in prokaryotes that protect the host from potentially harmful foreign DNA. They typically consist of a DNA methyltransferase (MTase), which methylates the host genome at an adenine (6 mA methylation) or cytosine (4mC or 5mC), and a restriction endonuclease (REase), which cleaves foreign, unmethylated DNA. In addition to the 2023 published family of 5mC-MTases, an HgaI-homolog RM system was detected in Mycoplasma hominis with the more rare constellation of two 5mC MTase genes, called RM.MhoVI. A qPCR screening of 239 randomly selected M. hominis isolates revealed a prevalence of the MhoVI-RM system of 12.97% (n = 31/239). Notably, in all tested MhoVI-positive isolates, the MhoVI-RM cassette localized between MHO_3110 and MHO_3120 and comprised an XRE-family transcriptional regulator gene in addition to the RM genes. Intra-species conservation of the encoded MhoVI-enzymes was high (> 99% identities), and inter-species conservation was the lowest compared to the eponymous species Haemophilus gallinarum (46.6% M1.MhoVI; 48.1% M2.MhoVI; 27.4% R.MhoVI). A polycistronic organization of the MhoVI-genes was strongly suspected due to the discovery of gene-overlapping mRNA regions. The MTases activity was demonstrated in RM.MhoVI positive M. hominis isolates by protection of genomic DNA from cleavage by the methylation-sensitive endonuclease HgaI; and bioinformatics analysis using the Dorado basecaller on the Oxford Nanopore sequenced genomes revealed methylation rates of the respective motifs, 5'-GAmCGC-3'/5'-GmCGTC-3', above 95% in MhoVI-positives, with a higher methylation frequency of 5'-GAmCGC-3' than 5'-GmCGTC-3 in most isolates. A final proof of MhoVI-RM representing an HgaI-RM-like methylation activity was demonstrated through expression and analysis of recombinant rM2.MhoVI in E. coli.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogelgsang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: