Cross-sectional analysis shows that WIC online ordering positively influences redemption rates, indicating improved access for low-income consumers.
To examine how WIC online food benefit ordering could influence WIC benefit redemptions. A cross-sectional study. We compare the average redemption rates between online ordering early adopters and non-adopters among WIC customers before and after implementing WIC online ordering. A propensity score-weighted difference-in-difference (DiD) model was used to estimate the coefficients. The Oklahoma WIC program and a grocery store chain in Oklahoma. 12,743 Oklahoma WIC households that had redeemed their food benefits at the grocery store chain in 2020. WIC online ordering significantly positively affected redemption rates for eight of the fifteen food categories. For example, the DiD coefficients (P-values) of these food categories were: cheese or tofu (0.077, < .01), yogurt (0.092, < .01), whole milk (0.082, .022), low-fat milk (0.060, < .01), eggs (0.049, .033), breakfast cereal (0.085, < .01), and infant formula (0.073, .039). Two food categories with significantly negative DiD coefficients had relatively lower redemption rates overall: canned fish (Coefficient = -0.209, P < .01) and infant cereal (Coefficient = -0.138, P = .015). There were no significant changes in the redemption of fruits and vegetables (Coefficient = 0.031, P = 0.121). Adopting WIC online ordering was positively associated with benefit redemption rates among most food benefit categories. Our findings provide preliminary but important evidence regarding online food benefit redemption among low-income consumers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: