Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case study examines how design practices influence well-being outcomes in transportation, highlighting affordance mechanisms.
People rely on daily interactions with artifacts, greatly influencing their physical, mental, and social well-being. Despite this, current design practices often overlook well-being as a core consideration. Affordance theory, which explains how an artifact’s features enable specific user actions and experiences, offers a promising lens for addressing this gap. This study focuses on assessing affordance mechanisms as a potential tool to support design practices to design for positive well-being outcomes. Using transportation modes as a case study, we interviewed college students to explore how specific mechanisms can contribute to positive or negative well-being outcomes. Findings resulted in 233 examples, which showed trends in mechanisms, modes, and well-being outcomes. Ultimately, this work presents an initial framework for embedding well-being considerations into design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilburn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: