Analysis reveals how non-state providers affect childcare quality and accountability in fragmented welfare contexts.
What are the implications of delegated provision for social policy outcomes in fragmented welfare regimes? Recent childcare policy reforms in Latin America have occurred in contexts characterised by deep segmentation and dualised labour markets, resulting in policies with varying models of service provision. I analyse how the delegation model to non‐state providers shapes crucial outcomes of public services. Using the case of the expansion of the Mexican public childcare system in the 2000s, I show how the choice of non‐state providers and the degree of state engagement in service provision condition the quality and accountability of public childcare. Drawing upon aggregate indicators and focus groups with parents using childcare services, the study compares policy characteristics and outcomes across childcare subsystems. The results show that the system's architecture generated inequalities in the quality and accountability of such services, perpetuating the insider–outsider divide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melina Altamirano (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: