What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study (also classified as: Meta-Analysis).

Impact of intraoperative margin optimization strategies compared to standard breast-conserving surgery on oncologic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and prospective trials

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Systematic review demonstrates lower re-excision and positive margin rates in breast-conserving surgery, suggesting new standard practices.

Intraoperative margin optimization reduced re-excision rates by 169 fewer per 1,000 patients, enhancing outcomes.
The study included six randomized controlled trials, providing a robust analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes.
Positive margin rates decreased significantly, indicating the effectiveness of optimization strategies in surgical practice.
The findings suggest that adopting these strategies could improve surgical quality without negatively impacting local recurrence.

Mirza et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Systematic review demonstrates lower re-excision and positive margin rates in breast-conserving surgery, suggesting new standard practices.

Intraoperative margin optimization reduced re-excision rates by 169 fewer per 1,000 patients, enhancing outcomes.
The study included six randomized controlled trials, providing a robust analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes.
Positive margin rates decreased significantly, indicating the effectiveness of optimization strategies in surgical practice.
The findings suggest that adopting these strategies could improve surgical quality without negatively impacting local recurrence.

Mirza et al. (2025) studied this question.

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark