Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review demonstrates lower re-excision and positive margin rates in breast-conserving surgery, suggesting new standard practices.
Achieving optimal surgical margins is critical in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to reduce local recurrence (LR) and the need for re-excision. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of intraoperative margin optimization strategies on key surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent BCS. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, including six randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes assessed included the re-excision rate (primary outcome), positive margin rate, local recurrence (LR), and overall survival (OS). The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The study protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database ( CRD420251000564 ). Intraoperative margin optimization significantly reduced re-excision rates (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.90), corresponding to 169 fewer re-excisions per 1,000 patients. Positive margin rates were also significantly lower (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.73), translating to 139 fewer positive margins per 1,000 patients. No statistically significant differences were observed for LR (OR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.16-3.19) or OS (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73-1.03). Intraoperative margin optimization effectively reduces positive margins and re-excisions in BCS without adversely affecting LR or OS. The incorporation of these strategies should be considered a standard practice to enhance surgical quality and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: