This review highlights recent advancements in bioinspired photonic materials, emphasizing their sustainable applications and optical properties.
The development of micro- and nano-scale photonic materials represents a cornerstone of modern science and technology. Nature, as a master architect, has served us with the most compelling and time-tested innovations and bio-designs. From the vibrant iridescent wings of butterflies to the anti-reflective eyes of moths, biological systems have long perfected the art of light manipulation through intricate micro- and nanoscale architectures. By decoding these biological mechanisms, harnessing nature-inspired design and interdisciplinary innovation, researchers unlock pathways to create materials with tailored optical properties, durability, and environmental adaptability. In the evolving landscape of photonic materials science, bioinspired micro-nano photonic materials emerge as a transformative frontier, bridging the ingenuity of biological evolution with cutting-edge photonic technologies. In this review, we provide an overview of research efforts on bioinspired micro-nano photonic materials, which offer multifunctional, adaptive, and sustainable solutions for next generation environmentally sustainable photonic materials and ultra-compact, energy-efficient photonic devices. We summarize the typical foundational principles of biological systems where nanostructures have evolved over millennia to master light. Furthermore, we highlight recent advances in bioinspired micro-nano photonic materials which have led to tremendous progress in eco-friendly structural color display, visual chroma sensor, high-security information encryption, energy-efficient functional optoelectrical devices, and so on. Finally, we discuss the challenges and prospects of bioinspired micro-nano photonic materials, including nature-inspired design, fabrication sustainability, and interdisciplinary synergy, for applications in telecom, energy, and biomedicine in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: