Systematic review reveals high interest in long-acting injectable PrEP among MSM and trans* individuals, suggesting significant HIV prevention potential.
Long-acting injectable pre-exposure-prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP) offers potentials for expanding PrEP coverage and improving public health outcomes. This study synthesises evidence on the prevalence and determinants of interest in and preference for LAI-PrEP among men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM), trans* individuals, and heterosexual women. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis building on quantitative studies from a previous review and new studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to December 31, 2023. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to pool the prevalence of LAI-PrEP interest and preference, and narratively synthesised their determinants across all key populations. We included 41 articles. 74% (95%CI:71-78) of MSM showed interest in using LAI-PrEP, and 37% (95%CI:29-44) of them preferred LAI-PrEP over other HIV prevention methods. The prevalence of interest and preference were even higher among current oral PrEP users (77% (95%CI:70-84), and 43% (95%CI:28-58), respectively). Interest in LAI-PrEP among trans* individuals was similarly high at 72% (95%CI:67-78), with one study reporting that 57% of transgender women preferred LAI-PrEP. Cis-gender heterosexual women also showed a high preference for LAI-PrEP (55%, 95%CI:40-70)). No significant differences were found between low-/middle-income countries and high-income countries across any key populations. Overall, people with more resources and who are already aware of and using oral PrEP are likely more interested in LAI-PrEP when it becomes available. Continued research is essential to effectively deploy LAI-PrEP and address HIV prevention gaps. As more countries adopt LAI-PrEP, understanding its impact and reaching underserved populations will be critical to maximising public health benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: