Bibliometric analysis reveals growing interest in library anxiety between 1927 and 2025, indicating trends and key contributors.
This study examines the global scientific literature on library anxiety. This study employs bibliometric analysis using the Lens.org database. Using the lens.org database, 560 data points were extracted. The study examines author productivity, journal productivity, and the correlation between PlumX metrics. The study uses R Studio, SPSS, and Lens.org for performance and science mapping analysis. The finding reveals a significant growth in research on library anxiety literature, reflecting growing scholarly interest in this domain. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie was the most prolific author, Nature was the most productive journal, while Springer Science and Business Media LLC was the leading publisher, with 156 articles. The PlumX metric analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between citation counts, captures, and mentions but no significant relationship with article usage or social media activity. The United States dominated library anxiety research, followed by Canada and Australia. This research offers a systematic bibliometric and altmetric analysis of library anxiety research. The research presents new information on research trends, influential authors, and usage patterns, which can guide subsequent studies and library management practices for improving the student experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: