This note examines type species fixation by Desmarest for Malthodes, highlighting issues surrounding cantharis sanguinolenta.
Doubts have been recently raised (Bouchard et al. 2024) on the type species fixation by Desmarest (1860: 5) of “M. sanguinolentus Linné” (sic, no date) for genus Malthodes Kiesenwetter, 1852. The reason for the doubts is that Cantharis sanguinolenta Linné, 1767 [= Meloe cinnaberina Scopoli 1763 (now in genus Cucujus Fabricius 1775)] has nothing to do with the genus Malthodes. The study of these ancient authors’ papers leads to the conclusion that “M. sanguinolentus” ‒ in the Desmarest meaning [namely Cantharis sanguinolenta Gyllenhal, 1808 (not Linné, 1767)] ‒ was perfectly representative of the Kiesenwetter concept of genus Malthodes. Desmarest indeed “mistook” authorship: the type species “should have” been ascribed to Gyllenhal, 1808, not to Linné; the homonymy between Cantharis sanguinolenta Gyllenhal, 1808 [= Malthodes minimus (Linné, 1758)] and Cantharis sanguinolenta Linné, 1767 [= Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763)] was, no doubt, among the reasons for the misquote. As a consequence, the type species of the genus Malthodes is Cantahris sanguinolenta Gyllenhal, 1808 (as M. sanguinolentus Linné) (currently a junior synonym of Malthodes minimus Linné, 1758) by subsequent designation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gianfranco Liberti (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: