What type of study is this?

This is a Literature Review study.

September 10, 2025AUC IURIDICAOpen Access

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The ECtHR's rationale for restricting freedom of expression does not adequately protect peaceful coexistence.
Reactions to the Danish cartoons sparked significant violent disagreements, emphasizing the complexity of religious sensitivities.
The article argues against restrictions based solely on experiences of violence related to religiously insensitive speech.
Conditions under which speech can genuinely disrupt religious peace are critically examined.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

The article critiques the ECtHR's rationale for limiting freedom of expression regarding offensive speech, indicating implications for religious peace.

Cite This Study

Lucie Jurečková (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d60654b1d3bfb60f9868 https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.502

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

The article critiques the ECtHR's rationale for limiting freedom of expression regarding offensive speech, indicating implications for religious peace.

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider