Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study shows SRS-RBD effectively measures self-reinforcement in blood donation behavior.
The current study aimed to develop and validate a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation (SRS-RBD). In Study 1, six items were created, and the factor structure of SRS-RBD was explored among 155 Chinese student blood donors. In Study 2, SRS-RBD was validated among 164 donors. In Study 3, a total of 850 blood donors were invited to participate in an online-survey measuring SRS-RBD at baseline, and their RBD behavior was captured 6 months later. A two-factor structure of SRS-RBD was established in Study 1 and further validated in Study 2 and Study 3. The SRS-RBD demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. A cut-off score of 20 was suggested as having the best performance to identify donors who had a high chance to re-donate. The SRS-RBD can be considered reliable in measuring the self-reinforcement of RBD among blood donors. The scale may be a useful tool in blood donation practice and research programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: