Retrospective assessment demonstrates variability in follow-up adherence and lesion progression rates in Bosniak IIF patients.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly used in the characterization of cystic renal lesions. Bosniak IIF lesions warrant follow-up, and their reported progression rate remains variable. In this single-center retrospective study we assessed renal CEUS exams (SonoVue®) with a diagnosis of Bosniak IIF lesion, conducted between 2015 and 2020. 56 patients (59 lesions) met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, lesion morphology, follow-up adherence, and outcomes were evaluated. Significant (p = 0.037) positive correlation was found between patient age and lesion size. 33.9% of patients were immediately lost to follow-up, and they tended to be younger, albeit not significantly (p = 0.09). Recommendation for follow-up imaging was indicated in 66.1% of the initial radiological reports. Follow-up adherence was not significantly lower for lesions with absent recommendation (55% vs. 70.27%, p = 0.26). Fewer (52%) female vs. male (74.19%) patients had a follow-up recommendation (p = 0.1, not significant). 10.8% of the followed lesions demonstrated progression within 5 years. Lesion reevaluation according to the 2020 European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) criteria resulted in 77.36% agreement with 22.2% of lesions being downgraded, and a single lesion being upgraded (p = 0.0015, significant). Follow-up adherence of Bosniak IIF cystic renal lesions was found to be suboptimal, with potential gender disparities. Standardization of follow-up recommendation in the report is an unmet need. Progression rate remains low, but is expected to change with the adoption of novel CEUS-specific criteria. The EFSUMB criteria in particular can improve selection of truly indeterminate lesions. Retrospectively registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Járay et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: