Key result
WCD delivers appropriate shocks at ~6 to ~9 events per 100 patient-years across cardiomyopathy cohorts.
Observational (n=19,598)
Yes
In patients with newly diagnosed reduced LVEF, there is a substantial risk of sudden cardiac arrest during early medical therapy optimization, which can be managed with a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator while awaiting LVEF recovery.
Background and Aims Patients with newly diagnosed non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) or myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease (MI/CAD) face an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) during the early phase of guideline-recommended medical therapy initiation and up-titration. Aim is to evaluate the risk in this population by assessing sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) due to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). Methods All patients in Germany who received a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) between December 2021 and May 2023 were enrolled in the observational multicentre SCD-PROTECT study (NCT06883383). The primary outcome was the incidence of SCA due to sustained VT/VF, measured by appropriate WCD-delivered treatments, and reported as events per 100 patient-years with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included inappropriate WCD treatments, all-cause mortality, adverse events, adherence to WCD use, and heart failure medication patterns. Results In this cohort of 19 598 patients, the mean age (±standard deviation) was 58.6 ± 13.7 years for those with NICM and 64.2 ± 10.6 years for patients with MI/CAD. Female patients accounted for 23.8% of the NICM and 16.3% of the MI/CAD group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at study start was 26.9 ± 10.3% for NICM and 28.4 ± 8.0% for MI/CAD patients. The incidence rate of first appropriate treatment by WCD in NICM patients and MI/CAD patients was 6.10 (95% CI 5.31–7.00) and 8.64 (95% CI 7.41–10.05) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Overall incidence density for all appropriate treatments was 8.53 (95% CI 7.36–9.88) and 14.98 (95% CI 12.69–17.65) per 100 patient-years in the respective groups. Improvement in LVEF to >35% was observed in 53.5% of NICM patients and 51.7% of MI/CAD patients over a mean of 65.9 ± 43.8 days. 36.2% of patients were implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator at the end of WCD use. Total mortality was 0.8%. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 0.5% of patients. Conclusions The SCD-PROTECT study highlights a substantial risk of SCA due to VT/VF during the early phase of guideline-recommended medical therapy optimization in patients with newly diagnosed reduced LVEF, regardless of ischaemic or non-ischaemic origin. The WCD provided SCD protection, the LVEF could improve to >35% in the majority of these patients and can therefore serve as risk stratification across both aetiologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duncker et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Newly diagnosed non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy or myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease (n=19,598). Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) vs. Myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease (MI/CAD) was evaluated on Incidence of sudden cardiac arrest due to sustained VT/VF (first appropriate WCD treatment). A wearable cardioverter-defibrillator delivered a first appropriate treatment at a rate of 6.10 and 8.64 per 100 patient-years in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and MI/CAD, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: