The co-simulation model evaluates autonomous driving and path planning in agricultural rovers, suggesting improvements in maneuverability.
The implementation of autonomous rovers in agriculture could be a promising solution to ensure, at the same time, productivity and sustainability. One of the key points of this kind of vehicle concerns their autonomous driving strategy. Generally, the strategy should include the path planning and path following algorithms. In this paper, an autonomous driving strategy assessing both is presented. To evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy, a case study of an agricultural rover is presented. A co-simulation model, including a multibody model of the rover, is developed in Matlab/Simulink and Hexagon Adams environments to virtually test the rover capabilities and the effects of its dynamics on the robustness of the algorithm. Given different orchard configurations, common but critical work scenarios are investigated, namely a 180° turn and an obstacle avoidance manoeuvre. The actual trajectory obtained during simulations are compared to the ideal trajectory defined in the path planning stage. Furthermore, the torque demand at the electric motors is evaluated. To consider a wide range of possible operating conditions, additional tests with different terrains, payloads and road slopes are included. Results showed that the rover managed to accomplish the considered manoeuvres on loam soil with a maximum trajectory deviation of 0.58 m, but a temporary overload of the motors is needed. On the contrary, in case of difficult terrains, such as muddy soil, the rover was not able to perform the manoeuvre. To limit tire slip, a traction control algorithm is developed and implemented, and the results are compared with the case without control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martelli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: