Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis shows increased performance in soccer players with coach feedback, suggesting enhanced training strategies.
This manuscript examines the influence of different types of feedback provided by the coach during small-sided games (SSG) on players’ performance. Sixteen U-16 amateur, healthy, and well-trained soccer players (age: 15.28 ± 0.48 years) participated in this study, playing several 3-min 4v4 SSG under the following conditions: 1) Absence of a coach (AC), 2) presence of a coach (PC), 3) general verbal stimulation (VS) from the coach, 4) verbal stimulation with offensive instructions (VS_OF), and 5) verbal stimulation with defensive instructions (VS_DF). Six physical performance variables were recorded using GPS devices (Catapult Vector S7), and seven technical-tactical performance variables were recorded and evaluated through video. The statistical analysis showed how the coach's presence significantly affected the players’ perceived effort (RPE) (p < .001), regardless of the type of verbal feedback provided. Defensive verbal instructions significantly influenced the total distance traveled regarding control condition (p = .046), the total number of passes made (p = .039), and the number of successful passes (p = .044). Offensive verbal instructions significantly increased the total number of passes made by the players (p = .019). and the number of successful passes (p = .004).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiménez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: