Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis highlights Mantegazza's proto-endocrinology and its limits compared to Darwin's views.
During the 1860s, both Charles-Édouard Brown-Séquard and Paolo Mantegazza pondered a proto-endocrine theory of semen being taken up into the blood, which would have androgenic effects. Mantegazza’s nomination as the foremost intellectual precursor to Brown-Séquardism, widely heard in Italy from the 1890s to the 1920s, is animated by the following three observations: (1) during the 1860s Mantegazza with his assistant Giulio Bizzozero undertook various testicular transplantation and reportedly even semen injection experiments and was acquainted, albeit faintly, with the more famous 1848/9 transplantation study by Arnold Berthold; (2) a subsequent conversation between Mantegazza and Charles Darwin over sexual selection pitted Mantegazza’s proto-endocrinology against Darwin’s evolutionary explanation of secondary sex traits; (3) Mantegazza’s theory hardly influenced his sanitarian texts and within his lifetime found only limited acknowledgement by Italian and German authors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diederik F. Janssen (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: