PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025JAMA Network Open16 citationsOpen Access

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Postpartum Contraction Pain During Elective Cesarean Delivery

View Full Paper
XXXingyu XiongMTMingshu TaoWZWenxin Zhao

Key Points

  • taVNS significantly reduced the incidence of moderate to severe uterine contraction pain compared to sham treatment.
  • Women in the active taVNS group experienced a moderate to severe pain rate of only 5.1% on day three, while the sham group had 28.2%.
  • The randomized clinical trial included 156 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery, providing robust statistical insights.
  • taVNS shows promise as a safe strategy for minimizing postpartum pain, depression, and anxiety while enhancing recovery quality.

Abstract

Importance Postpartum uterine contraction pain manifests as a severe, intermittent lower abdominal discomfort caused by uterine contraction during the early puerperium. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has demonstrated promising effects in managing both acute and chronic pain conditions; however, there remains a paucity of studies regarding the use of taVNS for alleviating postpartum uterine contraction pain. Objective To investigate the effect of taVNS in alleviating postpartum uterine contraction pain among women receiving combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 6 to August 31, 2024, at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China. Participants were aged 18 years or older and scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. Statistical analysis was performed in September 2024. All analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Interventions Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to either the active taVNS group or the sham taVNS group. Both groups received the stimulation for 30 minutes each time, once a day, on the day of surgery and postoperative days 1 and 2. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe postpartum uterine contraction pain on the third postoperative day, evaluated using a visual analogue scale (uterine contraction pain was classified as moderate to severe if the score was ≥4). Secondary outcomes included peak uterine contraction pain and incision pain, postpartum anxiety, postpartum depression, postpartum recovery quality, and sleep quality. Results A total of 156 women were recruited and randomized to the active taVNS group (78 patients; mean SD age, 31.5 4.3 years) or the sham taVNS group (78 patients; mean SD age, 31.3 4.5 years). The incidence of moderate to severe uterine contraction pain in the active taVNS group was 5.1% (4 of 78) compared with 28.2% (22 of 78) in the sham taVNS group on the third postoperative day (relative risk, 0.18 95% CI, 0.07-0.50; P lt; .001) The active taVNS group had lower median scores on the third postoperative day for incisional pain (visual analogue score: 2.20 IQR, 2.00-2.50 vs 3.00 IQR, 2.60-3.33), depression (EPDS: 3.00 IQR, 2.00-4.00 vs 5.00 IQR, 3.00-6.00), and anxiety (PRAQ-R2: 13.50 IQR, 12.00-15.00 vs 15.00 IQR, 13.75-17.00), as well as significantly higher scores for recovery quality on the third postoperative day (ObsQoR-11: 104 IQR, 103-105 vs 99 IQR, 96-101) and sleep quality on the second postoperative day (LSEQ: 52.00 IQR, 50.00-55.00 vs 47.50 IQR, 43.00-52.00) compared with the sham taVNS group. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, taVNS significantly reduced uterine contraction pain, incisional pain, depression, and anxiety, and improved recovery quality and sleep quality compared with sham taVNS. These findings suggest that taVNS represents a novel and safe strategy for alleviating postpartum uterine contraction pain among women undergoing cesarean delivery and for promoting postoperative recovery. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2400082716

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiong et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d7ee54b1d3bfb60fa008https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29127
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Noradrenergic α1, α2, and β1receptors mediate VNS-induced theta oscillations2023 · 2 citations
  2. 2Onset Timing, Thoughts of Self-harm, and Diagnoses in Postpartum Women With Screen-Positive Depression Findings2013 · 1,110 citations
  3. 3Postpartum Depression—Identifying Risk and Access to Intervention2022 · 81 citations
  4. 4Women’s experiences of fear of childbirth: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies2019 · 206 citations
  5. 5Efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain in patients with head and neck cancers (RELAX): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial2023 · 9 citations