Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel approach validates target peptides for meat authentication, suggesting improved safety in food labeling.
Amidst growing demand for meat products, concerns regarding their authenticity and safety have intensified, primarily due to potential fraudulent substitutions of cheaper meats, which are not accurately labeled. This study presents a novel strategy for the rapid screening and validation of target peptides for accurate quantitative analysis using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) coupled with multivariate statistical analysis. By integrating hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) with parallel reaction monitoring (PRM), five species-specific peptides were validated as reliable biomarkers for pork quantification. These peptides demonstrated accurate quantification in simulated meat products with known accurate contents, achieving recoveries of 78–128%, with RSD less than 12%. This methodology markedly enhances screening efficiency by excluding 80% of non-quantitative peptides, providing a robust solution for meat authenticity verification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: