Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative evaluation of extraction methods reveals optimal protein yield and digestibility in moringa seeds, highlighting enzyme-assisted extraction's advantages.
Moringa oleifera seeds are rich in protein, yet their potential as plant-based protein in food remains underutilized. This study evaluated the extraction efficiency, composition, and techno-functional properties of moringa seed protein isolate (MSPI) using enzyme-assisted (EAE), ultrasonic-assisted (UAE), and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) methods, compared to conventional alkaline extraction (CE). EAE was performed with viscozyme (2%, pH 8, 50 °C, 2 h) and papain (1%, pH 7, 50 °C, 1 h), UAE at 40% amplitude (20 kHz, 20 min), and MAE at 800 W (50 °C, 90 s). All methods significantly improved extraction yield (14.60–30.08%), protein content (80.47–86.61%), solubility (40.78–60.09% at pH 10), and techno-functional properties over CE. However, MAE slightly reduced solubility. Phytates (0.83–0.49 g/100 g) and trypsin inhibitor activity significantly decreased (4.48–1.92 U/mg). In vitro protein digestibility improved (p < 0.05) across all samples (88.11–93.81%), with hydrolysis patterns supporting the enhanced digestibility. Structural modifications were indicated by altered surface hydrophobicity and thermal properties. SDS-PAGE showed consistent major protein bands at 17, 25, and 48–63 kDa, with EAE showing reduced intensity at ~63 kDa. While UAE and MAE achieved high protein yield and purity, EAE offered the best balance of functionality and digestibility, making it the most promising method for producing high-quality MSPI. These findings are relevant for guiding the selection of extraction methods for MSPI recovery for food applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anyiam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: