Randomized trial compared delafloxacin to best available therapy in patients with surgical site infections, indicating the potential for effective treatment.
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common skin and skin structure infections and are mostly polymicrobial, requiring hospitalization and broad-spectrum antibiotics. This clinical trial evaluated the noninferiority of delafloxacin vs best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of superficial or deep incisional SSI following a cardiothoracic/related leg or abdominal surgical procedure. Methods In this randomized, observer-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase IIIb study, patients with SSI were randomized 1:1 to receive delafloxacin 300 mg intravenous (IV)/450 mg oral (OS) or BAT IV/OS (vancomycin or linezolid for cardiothoracic SSI, piperacillin/tazobactam or tigecycline for abdominal SSI). The primary end point was clinical success, defined as the clinical response (cure or improved) at test of cure (TOC), performed 7–14 days after end of treatment (EOT) visit. Secondary end points were clinical success at EOT, sustained clinical response at last follow-up (LFU), microbiological response, and safety. Results Thi study enrolled 266 patients (delafloxacin = 134; BAT = 132) with comparable baseline characteristics between the 2 treatment arms. Delafloxacin clinical success was noninferior vs BAT at TOC visit (91.8% vs 90.2%, respectively). Similar efficacy was confirmed at LFU (91.8% delafloxacin; 87.9% BAT). Comparable microbiological response was obtained with delafloxacin (89.5%) and BAT (79.4%). Delafloxacin and BAT demonstrated comparable treatment adverse event rates (23.9% and 19.7%, respectively), mostly mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusions This study provided new data on delafloxacin in SSIs, covering the need for effective empiric treatment against the wide spectrum of pathogens involved in these infections. Clinical Trials registration NCT04042077; 2018-001082-17 (EudraCT).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belev et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: