Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This report compares the utilization of a bio-psycho-socio-ecological approach in ABI care systems in Italy and the US, highlighting disparities in rehabilitative services.
Acquired Brain injury (ABI) is now widely regarded as a chronic condition but this change in conceptualization has not yet been realized in the way rehabilitation and care are offered and funded in the United States. Similarly, it is widely accepted that an optimized ABI system includes integration across the phases of care and recovery that considers the bio-psycho-socio-ecological (BPSE) dimensions beyond the injury itself. Despite the importance of BPSE factors informing care, typical post-injury care and management remain focused on acute presentation and the biological nature of the injury and there still exists relevant inter-country differences for disorders of consciousness (DoC) neurorehabilitation after severe ABI. This collaboration with Italian colleagues explores and compares the types and locations of rehabilitative services offered in a Post-Coma Unit of neurorehabilitation center in Italy (namely, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS in Rome) and in the United States following a “severe” ABI (sABI). This narrative seeks to describe the degree to which both systems utilize a BPSE informed approach to care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cioe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: