Retrospective analysis uncovers strong link between vitamin D receptor and hormone receptors in breast carcinoma patients, suggesting new implications.
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease in which estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67 play crucial roles in molecular subtyping, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, showing positivity in nearly 90% of cases. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) has been implicated in the oncogenesis and prognosis of various tumors, but its relationship with molecular subtyping factors in breast carcinomas remains to be clarified. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 111 patients who underwent surgery for breast carcinoma. Clinicopathological data were retrospectively analyzed in relation to VDR expression. Histological grade, hormone receptor (HR) status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and other clinicopathological parameters were recorded and their associations with VDR expression were statistically evaluated. Histological grading showed grade 1 in 3.7%, grade 2 in 41.4%, and grade 3 in 54.9% of cases. HR positivity was found in 60.3% of patients, while 39.7% were HR-negative. Ki-67 expression was ≥20% in 65.7% and <20% in 34.3% of cases. VDR expression was low in 54%, moderate in 26.1%, and high in 19.9% of patients. A strong correlation ( P < .001) was observed between VDR expression and ER, PR, HR, and Ki-67, while a significant association ( P = .025) was found with necrosis and mortality. Additionally, no significant correlation with histological grade ( P = .056) was noted. The findings suggest a strong association between VDR and ER, PR status, and the Ki-67 proliferation index in breast carcinoma. Further studies are needed to explore the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of VDR in breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ünlü et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: