Machine learning predicts average voltage in battery electrodes, highlighting features that influence performance.
Batteries are ubiquitous, with their presence ranging from electric vehicles to portable electronics. Research focused on increasing average voltage, improving stability, and extending cycle longevity of batteries is pivotal for the advancement of battery technology. These advancements can be accelerated through research into battery chemistries. The traditional approach, which examines each material combination individually, poses significant challenges in terms of resources and financial investment. Physics-based simulations, while detailed, are both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Researchers aim to mitigate these concerns by employing Machine Learning (ML) techniques. In this study, we propose a Transformer-based deep learning model for predicting the average voltage of battery electrodes. Transformers, known for their ability to capture complex dependencies and relationships, are adapted here for tabular data and regression tasks. The model was trained on data from the Materials Project database. The results demonstrated strong predictive performance, with lower mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE), and higher R2 values, indicating high accuracy in voltage prediction. Additionally, we conducted detailed per-ion performance analysis across ten working ions and apply sample-wise loss weighting to address data imbalance, significantly improving accuracy on rare-ion systems (e.g., Rb and Y) while preserving overall performance. Furthermore, we performed SHAP-based feature attribution to interpret model predictions, revealing that gravimetric energy and capacity dominate prediction influence, with architecture-specific differences in learned feature importance. This work highlights the potential of Transformer architectures in accelerating the discovery of advanced materials for sustainable energy storage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhason et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: