Experimental analysis quantified the repair effects of waste bio-oil and mineral oil rejuvenators on aged asphalt, suggesting distinct chemical and physical mechanisms.
Aging of asphalt is a major cause of pavement distress. While regenerators restore aged asphalt, their mechanisms and efficacy differences remain unclear. This study quantified the repair effects of waste bio-oil (WBO) and mineral oil (MO) rejuvenators on aged asphalt binder using a comprehensive characterization approach. Conventional properties (penetration, softening point, ductility), functional groups (FT-IR), thermal stability (TG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic shear rheology (DSR) were analyzed. Results reveal distinct mechanisms: WBO acts chemically via polar molecules, selectively reducing oxygen-containing groups and significantly improving ductility, while MO acts physically through light components that dilute viscosity, exhibiting weaker chemical repair. WBO-regenerated asphalt showed a lower thermal-oxidative peak temperature, superior low-temperature ductility, and enhanced high-temperature rheological performance (higher rutting factor, optimized viscoelasticity). These mechanistic differences—chemical restoration (WBO) versus physical replenishment (MO)—determine performance outcomes at the binder level. The findings provide a theoretical basis for regenerator selection in pavement engineering, highlighting WBO’s advantages for functional group restoration and balanced thermal rheological properties, supporting sustainable road development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: